Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited

Shareholder Securities Fraud Litigation

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Announces A Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited (NYSE: YGE)

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., including former Special Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy J. MacFall, announces that a complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the American Depository Shares (“ADSs”) of Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited (“Yingli” or the “Company”) (NYSE: YGE) between March 18, 2014 and May 15, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”).

If you purchased ADSs of Yingli during the Class Period and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120, Wilmington, DE 19803 at (888) 969-4242; by e-mail to info@rl-legal.com.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects.  Specifically, the Complaint alleges that the defendants concealed from the investing public that: (1) the Company was inappropriately recognizing revenue; (2) the Company had no reasonable prospects to collect on certain accounts receivable based on historical customer conduct; (3) the Company was no longer able to borrow from commercial banks to fund its operations; (4) the Company’s inability to raise additional capital or borrow funds from commercial banks threatened the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about Yingli’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.  As a result of defendants’ false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.

According to the Complaint, on May 15, 2015, the Company filed its Annual Report with the SEC disclosing there is “substantial doubt” that Yingli can remain solvent, stating, “[o]ur substantial indebtedness and net loss may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as our ability to meet our payment obligations.”

On this news, ADSs in Yingli dropped over 12%, closing at $1.49 per share on May 18, 2015, on heavy trading volume of over 3.9 million shares.

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 27, 2015.  A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.  In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member’s claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class.  Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff.  Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

While Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. did not file the Complaint in this matter, the firm, with offices in Wilmington, Delaware and Garden City, New York, regularly litigates securities class, derivative and direct actions, shareholder rights litigation and corporate governance litigation, including claims for breach of fiduciary duty and proxy violations in the Delaware Court of Chancery and in state and federal courts throughout the United States.

Attorney advertising.  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.